SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Del) 4556

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
J.R. MIDHA, J.

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD - Appellant
Versus
PURAN LAL & ORS - Respondents
FAO 385/2013 and C.M. No.15735/2013
Decided on : 28-10-2015

Advocate Appeared:
For the Respondents:Mr Anup J. Bhambhani, Senior Advocate, as amicus curiae with Mr. Joydeep Majumdar, Mr. Satyam Thareja and Mr. Rohit Dutta, Advocates
Mr. Rahul Mehra, Sr. Standing counsel for GNCTD with Mr. Shekhar Budakoti and Mr. Sanyog Bahadur, Advocates
Ms. Aayushi Gupta proxy for Mr. Raman Duggal, Standing Counsel for GNCTD
Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC for Delhi Police with Mr. O.P. Singh, ACP (Railways) and Insp. Hari Krishan, P.S. SRRS
Mr. Krishna Mohan, Advocate for respondent No.3

The central legal point established in the judgment is the emphasis on the successful implementation of the Employees Compensation Agreed Procedure for timely payment of compensation to the victims of accidents within 90 days of the accident.

Headnote:

Employees Compensation Act - Implementation of Employees Compensation Agreed Procedure - Section 10A(1), Section 25A - The court discussed the relevant provisions of the Employees Compensation Act and the procedure for investigation and award of compensation under the Act. The court emphasized the successful implementation of the Employees Compensation Agreed Procedure for timely payment of compensation to the victims of accidents within 90 days of the accident.

Fact of the Case:

The court discussed the implementation of the Employees Compensation Agreed Procedure and the expected clearance of backlog by the government. It also highlighted the submission of a report by the DCP (Railways) and the suggestions made by the learned amicus curiae regarding the relevant provisions of the 'Claims Tribunal Agreed Procedure' formulated by the court in a previous case.

Finding of the Court:

The court directed the Delhi Police and the Commissioners, Employees’ Compensation to start the implementation of the Employee Accident Report (EAR) for a period of six months and submit a report on its functioning. The court emphasized the successful implementation of the Employees Compensation Agreed Procedure for timely payment of compensation to the victims of accidents within 90 days of the accident.

Issues: The issues revolved around the implementation of the Employees Compensation Agreed Procedure, clearance of backlog, and the expected functioning of the Employee Accident Report (EAR) for a period of six months.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the successful implementation of the Employees Compensation Agreed Procedure for timely payment of compensation to the victims of accidents within 90 days of the accident.

Final Decision: The court directed the implementation of the Employee Accident Report (EAR) for a period of six months and emphasized the successful implementation of the Employees Compensation Agreed Procedure for timely payment of compensation to the victims of accidents within 90 days of the accident.

JUDGMENT :

1. Mr. Rahul Mehra, learned Standing Counsel for Government of NCT of Delhi submits that five posts of Joint Labour Commissioners have been filled up, out of which four officers have already joined and one officer would be joining shortly. It is further submitted that two officers are already dealing with the Employees Compensation Act cases. It is submitted that the entire backlog is expected to be cleared by 29th February, 2016.

2. With respect to the fresh cases, the DCP (Railways) had submitted a report dated 03rd September, 2015 along with the format of the Employee Accident Report (EAR).

3. Mr. Anup J. Bhambhani, learned amicus curiae submits that the relevant provisions of the “Claims Tribunal Agreed Procedure” formulated by this Court in Rajesh Tyagi v. Jaibir Singh, I (2015) ACC 838(Del.) be incorporated in the cases relating to the employees compensation. It is further suggested that the procedure relating to the Employees Accident Report (EAR) be implemented initially for a period of six months.

4. The Delhi Police and the Commissioners, Employees’ Compensation, shall start the implementation of Employee Accident Report (EAR) w.e.f. 01st December, 2015 initially for a period of six months. The Delhi Police as well as Commissioners, Employees Compensation Act shall submit a report with respect to the functioning of this system for the first three months i.e. 01st December, 2015 to 29th February, 2016. The report be submitted by 10th March, 2016 whereupon this Court shall consider whether this procedure requires any modification/variation. The detailed procedure is as under:

“EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION AGREED PROCEDURE

1. Investigation of accidents arising out of and in the course of cases by the police

Immediately on receipt of the information of an accident, the Investigating Officer of Police shall inspect the site of accident, take photographs of the site of the accident from all angles, prepare a site plan and collect the relevant evidence. The Investigating Officer shall conduct spot enquiry by examining the eye-witnesses.

2. Duty of the police to complete the investigation of the criminal case and to file the chargesheet (Report under Section 173 Cr.P.C.) before the Metropolitan Magistrate and EAR along with copy of the chargesheet before the Commissioner, Employees’ Compensation within 30 days

The police shall make every endeavour to complete the investigation of the criminal case and shall submit the Employee Accident Report (EAR) with the Commissioner, Employees’ Compensation within 30 days of the accident. The EAR shall be in the form attached hereto as Annexure-A and shall be accompanied with the documents mentioned therein.

3. Copy of EAR to be furnished to the claimants, employer and the insurance company.

The Investigation Officer shall furnish the copy of EAR to the employee/legal representatives of the deceased employee, employer and the insurance company (if the employer had taken an insurance policy).

4. Extension of time to file EAR

Where the Investigating Officer is unable to complete the investigation within 30 days for reasons beyond his control, he shall seek extension of time to file EAR from the Commissioner, Employees’ Compensation.

5. Duty of the hospital to issue MLC and Post-mortem Report within 15 days of the accident

The concerned hospital shall issue the MLC and Post-Mortem Report, if any, to the Investigating Officer within 15 days of the accident.

6. Investigating Officer to seek necessary directions from the Commissioner, Employees’ Compensation

In the event of failure of the employer, Insurance Company and/or claimants to disclose the relevant information and documents required to complete the EAR, the Investigating Officer shall seek necessary directions from the Commissioner, Employees’ Compensation whereupon the Commissioner shall, in appropriate cases, direct the parti


























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top