SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Del) 2199

P.S.TEJI
STATE – Appellant
Versus
HARGYAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Rajat Katyal, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
For the Respondent:Mr. Manjeet Singh, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

P.S. TEJI, J.

Crl. M.A. No.17403/2015 (Condonation of delay) & Crl. M.A. No.17404/2015 (Delay in re-filing)

By these applications filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act read with Section 482 of Cr. P.C., the petitioner seeks condonation of delay of 12 days in preferring the present revision petition and 66 days in re-filing the petition.

For the reasons stated in the applications, the delay in filing as well as re-filing the petition is condoned. Applications allowed.

Crl.Rev.P. 770/2015

1. By this petition filed under Section 397 of Cr. P.C. the State has preferred to challenge the order dated 22.04.2015 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (01), West, Tis Hazari, Delhi in FIR No. 651/2014 under Section 408 of IPC registered at Police Station Kirti Nagar, Delhi, whereby the respondent has been ordered to be released on bail under Section 167(2) of Cr. P.C..

2. As per prosecution, the FIR No. 651/2014 was registered consequent to the complaint of one Prince Walia on 29.09.2014 under Section 408 of IPC against the accused and others on the ground that on internal audit, it was discovered that there was a physical shortage of Rs.73,85,100/-in different ATMs of Corpora














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top