PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, PRATIBHA RANI
Swati – Appellant
Versus
Ravish Kashyap – Respondent
Pradeep Nandrajog, J.
1. A fair amount of cacophony has been created by the appellant in an appeal spanning 46 pages. The result is all and sundry directions issued from time to time in the appeal.
2. Vide impugned order dated October 28, 2013 the learned Judge, Family Court has decided the application filed by the appellant under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 by granting her maintenance in sum of Rs.3000/- (Rupees Three Thousand only) per month. The order notes that the appellant is maintaining an infant daughter born to the parties during the subsistence of the wedlock.
3. Salary of the respondent has been accepted to be Rs.9000/- (Rupees Nine Thousand only) per month.
4. Case pleaded by the appellant in her application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 was that the respondent was working as a Regional Manager with M/s Horizons Lamkraft Pvt. Ltd., D-4, DSIDC Complex, Kirti Nagar, New Delhi-110015, at a monthly salary of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only). She claimed maintenance in sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) per month for self and her minor daughter.
5. The respondent denied the assertion and claimed to be an employee of M/s
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.