SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Del) 2971

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, PRATIBHA RANI, JJ.
Council of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India - Petitioner
Versus
Mahesh Kumar Gupta & Anr. - Respondents
Chat A. Ref. 2 of 2012
Decided On : 12-08-2016

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Rakesh Aggarwal, Mr. Pulkit Agarwal

Threatening a client constitutes professional misconduct under the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.

Headnote:

Chartered Accountants - Professional Misconduct - Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, Section 21(5), Section 21(6)(b), Section 22, Part I of the First Schedule - The court discussed the complaint against the respondent, the findings of the Disciplinary Committee, and the provisions of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949. It highlighted the definition of professional misconduct, the power of the Council to inquire into misconduct, and the specific misconduct of threatening a client. The court concurred with the Council's view and imposed a penalty of reprimand on the respondent.

Fact of the Case:

The complaint alleged that the respondent demanded an exorbitant sum as professional fee and used threatening language in communication. The Disciplinary Committee found the respondent guilty of professional misconduct for using threatening language but absolved him of other charges.

Finding of the Court:

The court concurred with the Council's view and imposed a penalty of reprimand upon the respondent.

Issues: Alleged exorbitant professional fee, threatening language in communication, soliciting work through personal communications, and disclosing client information.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that a professional who threatens a client commits misconduct, and the act is not expected by members of civil society. The court also highlighted the power of the Council to inquire into misconduct and the specific provisions of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.

Final Decision: The court disposed of the reference and imposed a penalty of reprimand upon the respondent.

JUDGMENT :

Pradeep Nandrajog, J.

1. The reference made to this Court by the Institute of Chartered Accountants under Section 21(5) of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 has reached for hearing today. Whereas counsel as above appear for the Institute of Chartered Accountants, the first respondent who is the contesting respondent has not appeared.

2. With the able assistance of Sh. Rakesh Aggarwal, Advocate we have gone through the record commencing from the complaint received against the first respondent till the final recommendation made to this Court by the Council Members at the meeting held on September 20 and 21, 2010 recommending penalty of reprimand, contemplated by Section 21(6)(b) of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 to be inflicted.

3. One S.K. Garg made a complaint on January 31, 2006 against the respondent alleging that the complainant had engaged the services of the respondent to file his personal and his family members income tax returns and as and when called upon to pay professional charges the complainant used to pay the professional charges and was surprised to receive a bill from the respondent on November 10, 2004 demanding a sum of Rs.3.8 lacs as professional fee for filing the returns of the complainant for 19 years commencing from the financial year 1985-86 till the financial year 2004-05. The bill was raised @ Rs.20,000/- per annum. As per the complainant the bill was accompanied by a threatening written communication which was alleged to be unethical the communication contained a threat to initiate legal action and with a limb informing the complainant that for the year 2004-05 the learned Assistant Commission Income Tax desired to verify the details of the loans stated to have been advanced by the complainant’s mother Shanti Devi. As per the complainant the learned Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax had not passed any order to said effect. A copy of the communication was alleged by the complainant to have been sent to the CMD of National Hydro Power Corporation. It was further alleged by the complainant that the respondent solicited professional work through personal communications.

4. The complaint was taken cognizance of. A Disciplinary Committee was constituted which heard the complainant and the respondent and the evidence placed on record by the complainant.

5. Noting that there was evidence to establish that the respondent was filing the income tax returns of the complainant and his family members, the Committee noted that the respondent had filed a Civil Suit for recovery of the professional outstanding dues and the issue was sub-judice. The Committee noted that along with the bill dated November 10, 2004 a written communication was sent in which it was written that if the payment was not made the respondent shall initiated legal proceedings against the complainant and that the Assistant of Income Tax has desired to verify the details of the loans concerning Ms. Shanti Devi.

6. The Committee opined that it was strange that the respondent would raise a bill for 19 years services rendered in the year 2004 and found no explanation from the respondent as to why for each year as and when professional services were rendered a bill was not raised. Finding no proof by the complainant that he had paid professional charges, the Committee did not delve any further on the merits of the dispute concerning Rs.3.8 lacs payable towards professional services rendered. Though no reasons have been expressly stated as to why the Committee left it at that, by noting the facts and making prima-facie observations, the reason appears to be that the dispute was a civil dispute and was sub-judice. But, with respect to the written communication appended by way of note to the bill, the Committee opined that the language was threatening and not expected of a Chartered Accountant who is looked upon by the society as a dignified professional. The threat pertaining to the second part of the note was found to be a wee bit aggrava












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top