VIPIN SANGHI
Sheela Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Mahendra Pal – Respondent
Vipin Sanghi, J.
1. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the respondent on the aspect of grant of leave.
2. Leave granted.
Crl. Appeal No. /2016 (to be registered and numbered)
3. Let the appeal be registered and numbered.
4. I have heard learned counsel for the appellant and proceed to dispose of the appeal at this stage itself.
5. The appellant assails the judgment dated 18.05.2015 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate – 03 (East), Karkardooma Courts, in complaint case No. 375/01/2011 whereby the appellant’s aforesaid complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was dismissed and the respondents/accused acquitted. The appellant had filed the said complaint on the premise that her late husband and the accused had friendly relations. The accused had approached her husband for a friendly loan of Rs. 10 lakhs in order to purchase a property. The complainant collected the amount of Rs. 10 lakhs from her resources and gave the same to the accused in the first week of October, 2008, for 24 months only. The amount was to be repaid in monthly instalments of Rs. 35000/- on fifth of every English calendar month. The rema
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.