SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Del) 3055

P.S.TEJI
FAHAD AZIZ AZMI – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Atin Chadha, Adv.
For the Respondent: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, APP., SI Varun, PS Jamia Nagar, Mr. R.C.S. Bhadoria, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

P.S. TEJI, J.

1. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioners, namely, Sh. Fahad Aziz Azmi, Sh. Faisal Nazir Azmi and Ms. Fatima Mariyam for quashing of FIR No.381/2014 dated 01.06.2014, under Sections 323/324/341/34 IPC registered at Police Station Jamia Nagar on the basis of the Memorandum of Understanding executed between the petitioners and respondent nos. 2 & 3, namely, Sh. Hifzur Rahman Azmi and Ms. Farhana Mariyam on 23.05.2016.

2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State submitted that the respondent no.2, present in the Court has been identified to be the complainant/first informant and respondent no.3 has been identified to be the victim in the FIR in question by their counsel.

3. The factual matrix of the present case is that complainants are eight brothers and his eldest brother/ Sh. Atiqur Rehman has 5 children. Out of these 5 children, Sh. Fahad Aziz Azmi, Sh. Faisal Nazir Azmi and Ms. Fatima Mariyam are the accused persons/petitioners and Sh. Hifzur Rahman Azmi and Ms. Farhana Mariyam are respondent nos.2 & 3 in the present case. It is the case of the complainant that Ms. Farhana Mariyam/respondent no.3 marr























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top