VALMIKI J.MEHTA
SHYAM AGGARWAL – Appellant
Versus
SHEIKH MOHAMMAD YAHYA CHHABRA – Respondent
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J.
1. Vide Order dated 31.01.2014 a detailed order was passed, and which is a consent order, whereby the only real issue in these legal proceedings was to be resolved by demarcation report prepared by the revenue officials as per the total station method which is demarcation is done as per the laser system, and which is done on account of lands becoming built up areas and which were originally revenue/agricultural lands.
2. The Order dated 31.1.2014 reads as under:-
“1. The disputes in the present case pertain to the claim of the respondent No.1/plaintiff with respect to the suit property which falls in khasra Nos.2898/120/2, 2899/121/1 and 2942/122, Moja Chandawli, Shahdara, Delhi which was purchased under a registered sale deed dated 24.5.1942 by Sh. Hazi Hamid Ullah who was predecessor-in-interest/father of the respondent no.1/plaintiff.
2. The case of the appellant herein/defendant no.1 in the trial Court (other defendants have not challenged the impugned judgments of the Courts below) is that the appellant/defendant No.1 is not on the khasra numbers which have been purchased by Sh. Hazi Hamid Ullah by the registered sale deed dated 24.5.1942 as stated a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.