Mukta Gupta, J.

1. The petitioner was summoned as an accused pursuant to charge sheet filed in case FIR No. 1138 of 2015 and vide order dated 22nd March, 2016 charge for offences punishable under Sections 354A/354D IPC and Sections 10 and 12 Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act was framed against him.

2. The grievance of the petitioner is two folds. Firstly, that he filed an application under Section 207 Cr.P.C. however without deciding the said application, the learned Trial Court framed charge as noted above vide order dated 22nd March, 2016 and secondly, vide order dated 11th April, 2016 dismissed the said application granting him liberty to summon the relevant record in his defence at appropriate stage under Section 91 Cr.P.C. The petitioner who is an accused in the above noted FIR relies on the part of charge sheet which notes “During investigation all relevant documents pertaining to internal enquiry conducted in school against accused Dinesh Puri was obtained and annexed with file”.

3. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that once relevant documents relating to the internal enquiry in relation to allegations of sexual harassment