Mukta Gupta, J.

1. Aggrieved by the order dated 4th April, 2016 dismissing the application under Section 311 Cr.P.C. filed by the petitioner/ accused in complaint case No. 509 of 14 titled as ‘Dhyan Kaur Vs. M/s. Game On & Ors.’ under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (in short the NI Act) for calling Sardar Trilok singh as a witness, the order dated 4th July, 2016 dismissing the second application under Section 311 Cr.P.C. for calling the concerned officials of Axis Bank with details of cheque No. 114932 dated 19th October, 2012 and cheque No. 114937 dated 3rd November, 2012 vide order dated 4th July, 2016 and quashing of the complaint case, the petitioner prefers the present petition.

2. A complaint under Section 138 NI Act was filed by Dhyan Kaur wife of Sardar Trilok Singh through her attorney Rishi Vadhera stating that she was the owner of premises No. 40/52, (Basement) Chitranjan Park, New Delhi and the said premises was given on rent to the tenant for 11 months for business purposes of running of Games Parlor (Snooker and Pool Table) commencing from 5th November, 2012 to 4th October, 2013 with an option to the accused firm to renew the same twice only at