SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Del) 3417

G.S.SISTANI, I.S.MEHTA
MANVIR SINGH YADAV – Appellant
Versus
DELHI JAL BOARD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Ms. Sweta Rani, Adv.
For the Respondent: Ms. Biji Rajesh, Ms. Eshita Baruah, Mr. Rahul Singhal, Adv. for Mr. Gaurang Kanth, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

G.S. SISTANI, J.

CM.APPL. 33059/2016

1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. The application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) 7966/2016

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, submits that on account of a typographical error three grounds, being Grounds A to C, urged in the present petition may be deleted.

4. At the oral request of the counsel for the petitioner, she is permitted to strike off the Grounds A to C of the writ petition in the Court itself and initial the same.

5. Challenge in this petition is to the order dated 26.8.2010 passed by Central Administrative Tribunal (in short ‘the Tribunal’) by which OA No.2615/2009 filed by the petitioner was dismissed.

6. The brief facts of the case are that on 1.8.2007, the petitioner was implicated in a criminal case, registered vide FIR No.58/2005 wherein he was kept in custody from 29.5.2005 to 3.6.2005, however, he was acquitted by the trial court vide order dated 1.8.2007 in Criminal Case No.1530/2005.

7. As per the petition, on 7.7.2008, the petitioner was appointed as Peon-cum-AMR on Muster Roll on











































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top