G.S. SISTANI, J.

1. Rule DB.

2. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, present writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.

3. Challenge in this writ petition is to the order dated 15.7.2014 passed by Central Administrative Tribunal (in short “the Tribunal”) by which TA No.120/2013 filed by the respondent herein stands allowed and the report of the first Complaint Committee dated 21.11.2003, the first order of the Disciplinary Authority dated 3.8.2004, the first order of the Appellate Authority dated 11.1.2005, the report of the second Complaint Committee dated 2.4.2007, second order of the Disciplinary Authority dated 7.4.2008 and the second order of the Appellate Authority dated 12.8.2008 have been quashed.

4. At the outset, it may be noticed that initially the respondent had filed W.P.(C) No. 8466/2008 before the this Court, however, the said matter was transferred to the Tribunal, which was then registered as T.A.No.120/2013 before the Tribunal.

5. The brief facts of the case are that initially the respondent served in the Defence Research and De