GITA MITTAL, R.K.GAUBA
ANIL KUMAR @ MITHU – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
R.K. GAUBA, J:
1. The appellants with one another (Satish Chander @ Chandra) were sent up for trial before the court of Sessions on the basis of report under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) submitted on 13.11.1990 upon conclusion of investigation into first information report (FIR) No.222/1990 of police Station Dabri (the police station) for offences punishable under Sections 302/324 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). Upon consideration of the evidence gathered during investigation by the police, as set out in the said police report (charge sheet), the learned additional sessions judge in seisin of the sessions case (No.30/1992) framed charge against all the four said persons for offences under Sections 302 read with Section 34 IPC.
2. Midway the trial, the fourth accused (Satish Chander @ Chandra) jumped bail and inspite of the issuance of duress process against him, his presence could not be secured. He was declared a proclaimed offender by the trial court vide order dated 27.02.1999. The trial continued against the remaining three (appellants before this Court) and culminated in judgment on 2nd March, 2000 whereby all of
State of Punjab vs. Sucha Singh
Karamjit Singh vs. State of Punjab
Golbar Hussain vs. State of Assam
Shyamal Saha vs. State of West Bengal
Dalip Singh vs. State of Punjab
Hari Obula Reddy vs. State of A.P.
Jodhan vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Pattipati Venkaiah vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
Khambam Raja Reddy vs. State of A.P.
Nankaunoo vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
Manjit Singh & Anr. vs. State of Punjab & Anr.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.