SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Del) 3769

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, PRATIBHA RANI, JJ.
SANTOSH SAHAY - Appellant
Versus
HANUMAN SAHAY - Respondent
MAT.APP.(F.C.) 63 of 2016
Decided on : 07-10-2016

Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr.A.K.Sharma & Mr.C.M. Sharma, Advocates.
For the Respondent:Mr.Arunav Tiwari, Advocate with respondent in person.

False accusations of adultery and illicit relationships, insulting and humiliating behavior, and performing 'Tantrik Kriyas' can constitute mental cruelty and grounds for divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

Headnote:

Cruelty - Divorce - HMA Petition No.73/10 - Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Section 24, Section 10 - The court upheld the decree of divorce granted by the Family Court based on the husband's evidence of mental cruelty by the wife, including insulting and humiliating behavior, false accusations of adultery and illicit relationships, and performing 'Tantrik Kriyas' to create fear for his life.

Fact of the Case:

The husband filed for divorce on the grounds of cruelty and desertion, citing instances of disrespectful behavior, tantrik activities, refusal of physical relations, and false accusations by the wife. The wife denied the allegations and raised counter-accusations of harassment and dowry demands.

Finding of the Court:

The Family Court dismissed the divorce petition on the ground of desertion but concluded that the wife's behavior amounted to mental cruelty, including insulting and humiliating the husband and guests, false accusations of adultery, and performing 'Tantrik Kriyas' to create fear for the husband's life.

Issues: The main issues were the allegations of cruelty and desertion, as well as the credibility of the husband's claims and the wife's counter-accusations.

Ratio Decidendi: The court found that the husband's evidence of mental cruelty by the wife, including insulting and humiliating behavior, false accusations of adultery, and performing 'Tantrik Kriyas' to create fear for his life, constituted sufficient grounds for granting the divorce.

Final Decision: The court upheld the decree of divorce granted by the Family Court, dismissing the appeal and affirming the finding of mental cruelty by the wife.

JUDGMENT :

PRATIBHA RANI, J.

1. The appellant/wife is in appeal impugning the judgment and decree dated January 30, 2016 whereby the respondent/husband has been granted a decree of divorce on the ground of cruelty. For the sake of convenience we shall be referring the parties as ‘the wife’ and ‘the husband’.

2. HMA Petition No.73/10 (Old No.402/07) was filed by the husband seeking dissolution of marriage with the respondent on the ground of cruelty and desertion. The status of the parties at the time of marriage as pleaded in para 2 of the divorce petition was as under:

(i) Husband 23 years Hindu Bachelor

(ii) Wife 18 years Virgin

3. The marriage was consummated. The couple was blessed with two sons – elder one born on July 12, 2003 and younger one born on September 09, 2005.

4. It was an arranged marriage. The husband was belonging to a family of farmers though employed as teacher in Rajasthan. The father of the wife was a Government servant. As per the husband the wife was not comfortable leading a rural life in the village. When the husband got selected as a teacher in Delhi after one year of marriage, he brought his wife to Delhi. There were some temperamental differences between the husband and wife and of the wife with her in-laws. As per the husband the wife used to disrespect the guests visiting them and was not even preparing tea for them. His wife was indulged in some tantrik activities and performing ‘Tantrik Kriya’ which terrified him. She also used to light a diya during midnight and perform puja. She also put clove, cardamom and beetle nut under his pillow cover. The wife also used to tie half baked bread smeared with vermilion on her belly, prepare a effigy of flour and used to insert the iron nail (keel) in it and immerse it in Yamuna river. She made an attempt to strangulate him with her hands. She also used to avoid physical relations. Though he tried to make her understand the need to satisfy the sexual desires, she did not pay any heed and continued avoiding him. Not only that, she also accused him of having illicit relationship with another lady. The husband has also pleaded that he is a non-smoker a teetotaller but he was defamed by her as an alcoholic and womanizer. This adversely affected his reputation in the family so much so that he even thought of committing suicide. The averments made in para 46 of the petition refer to the incident where after the wife left the matrimonial home, are extracted hereunder:

’46. That from that day the Petitioner had the sleepless night, the petitioner was always worried about his sons and their life. The petitioner never had sleep after that day. The respondent again one day when petitioner was sleeping came and again tried to strangulate him. The respondent was as if she was under some evil spell, taking the knife in her hand she tried to kill the petitioner. It was midnight time; the petitioner after getting rid of her went out of his house and keeps on roaming in the street like a mad whole night. The bad thoughts about his sons keep on haunting the Petitioner whole night. The petitioner after mustering up some courage and believing god went back to his house in the morning but to his shock and his dismay, the respondent was gone with his both son. That when enquired from the neighbours it transpired that the Respondent without informing anybody with her bag and baggage.’

5. The husband sought divorce on the ground of cruelty and desertion.

6. In the written statement the wife denied all the instances of cruelty and desertion alleged in the divorce petition. She pleaded that her husband was not a bachelor at the time of his marriage with her. His first wife committed suicide by jumping into the well because of the harassment and torture caused to her. After her marriage she was also severely beaten by her father-in-law Sh.Ram Sahay and brothers-in-law Sh.Ranjeet, Sh.Parbhas Dayal, Sh.Ram Gopal and Sh.Ram Babu. She also claimed that she was harassed on non-fulfilment of the d





















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top