SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Del) 3887

P.S.TEJI
RAJ KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE NCT OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Ms. Prerana, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. M.S. Oberoi, Adv. with Sub-Inspector Prem Pal

JUDGMENT :

P.S. TEJI, J.

1. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioners, namely, Sh. Raj Kumar and Smt. Kamla for quashing of FIR No.257/2008 dated 23.07.2008 under Sections 420/448/467/471/34/120-B IPC registered at Police Station Ashok Vihar on the basis of settlement arrived at between the petitioners and respondent no. 2, namely, Sh. Ajit Singh.

2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State submitted that the respondent no. 2 present in the Court has been identified to be the complainant/first informant by SI Prem Pal.

3. The factual matrix of the present case is that in the year 1998, the complainant had purchased a plot bearing no. B-721, Weavers Colony, Ashok Vihar, Delhi, hereinafter, referred to as “Property in Question”, from one Sh. Nanak Chand. After some time, father of the complainant and petitioner no.1 purchased the adjoining plot i.e. Plot No. B-720 with a view that both the brothers would reside together.

Since the accused no.1 was not engaged in any work and had no income, the complainant provided funds for the construction and while the construction was going on, the complainant resided in MCD Flats, Kamla Nagar. Th






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top