SIDDHARTH MRIDUL
GYAN CHAND VERMA – Appellant
Versus
VEENA RANI – Respondent
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.
1. The present appeal assails the judgment and decree dated 26.03.2014, passed by the Court of Ld. Additional District Judge (North-East)-01, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi, whereby Suit No. 38/2008 titled as Gyan Chand Verma v. Veena Rani, for declaration and permanent injunction, filed by the appellant (Plaintiff therein), has been partly decreed in favour of the appellant to the limited extent that the respondent has been restrained from dispossessing the appellant from property bearing No. D-1/37 built on plot measuring 67, out of Khasra No. 21, situated at village Mandoli in the abadi of Gali No. 27, Harsh Vihar, Shahdara, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the property in question), without adopting due process of law. The other reliefs sought in the suit, being declaration qua the property in question and permanent injunction against the respondent, were not granted vide the judgment and decree dated 26.03.2014, impugned herein.
2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the appellant is the father-in-law of the respondent and it is alleged in the former’s plaint that he is the owner of, and in possession of the property in question, transfer of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.