SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Del) 3561

S.P.GARG
JEEWAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF (GOVT. OF NCT) DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Ms. Ritu Rastogi.
For the Respondents: Mr. Amit Gupta.

JUDGMENT :

S.P. GARG, J.

1. Present revision petition has been preferred to challenge the legality and correctness of a judgment dated 30.11.2015 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Crl.A.No. 34/2014 by which conviction and sentence under Section 354 IPC awarded by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate vide orders dated 10.09.2014 and 22.09.2014 were upheld. The petitioner was awarded SI for one year with fine Rs. 500/- for commission of offence punishable under Section 354 IPC in case FIR No.533/2009 registered at PS Pandav Nagar.

2. Briefly stated, the prosecution case as set up in the charge-sheet was that on 20.10.2009 at around 11.30 a.m. the petitioner outraged the modesty of the prosecutrix / complainant ‘X’ (changed name) when she visited Dr.Gulab Gupta’s clinic at C-4/19, Main Patparganj, Acharya Niketan, Delhi. After recording victim’s statement (Ex.PW-2/A), the Investigating Officer lodged First Information Report. Statements of the witnesses conversant with the facts were recorded. The accused was arrested. Upon completion of investigation, a charge-sheet was filed against the accused in the Court. The prosecution examined six witnesses to establish its case. In 313 Cr.P.C. s












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top