SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Del) 3656

VIPIN SANGHI
Dheeraj Singh – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Police – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Swastik Singh, Mr. Atul Singh, Mr. Himanshu Dagar
For the Respondents: Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, Ms. Parul Jamwal, Mr. Peeyush Bhatia

JUDGMENT :

Vipin Sanghi, J.

Crl. M.A. No. 15464 of 2016

1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. The application stands disposed of.

W.P. (Crl) 2881 of 2016 & Crl. M.A. No. 15463 of 2016

3. Issue notice. Mr. Mahajan accepts notice.

4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and proceed to judgment.

5. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition to seek a writ of certiorari quashing the notice dated 20.07.2016 issued by respondent No.2 under Section 47 read with Section 50 of the Delhi Police Act proposing to extern the petitioner. The said notice in its material part reads as follows:-

“In order to give you an opportunity of tendering your explanation regarding the said allegations, I have appointed 09.08.2016 at 10 AM to receive your explanation and to hear you and your witnesses, if any, with regards to said allegations.

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers vested on me under Section 47 of the Delhi Police Act, 1978 conferred upon me by the order of Commissioner of Police Delhi u/s 8 of the Delhi Police Act, 1978, I Manoj C, Addl. Dy. Commissioner

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top