VALMIKI J.MEHTA
NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION – Appellant
Versus
PRASHANT NARULA – Respondent
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J
1. This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the North Delhi Municipal Corporation/defendant against the concurrent Judgments of the courts below; of the Trial Court dated 5.12.2013 and the First Appellate Court dated 23.2.2015; by which the courts below have decreed the suit for declaration and permanent injunction filed by the respondent nos. 1 and 2/plaintiffs with respect to the suit property failing in Khasra no. 262, 258 and 217/4 of Village Bhrola, Delhi. Neither in the plaint nor in the site plan filed with the plaint area of the suit property is specified, however, counsel for respondent nos. 1 and 2/plaintiffs state that the suit property is a plot admeasuring 300’ X 80’ as stated in the Agreement to Sell/Ex.PW1/3 dated 4.12.1998 executed by respondent no.2/Sh. Jai Prakash/plaintiff no. 2 in favour of respondent no.1/Sh. Prashant Narula/plaintiff no. 1. The suit has been decreed by the courts below in favour of respondent nos. 1 and 2/plaintiffs by declaring that the appellant is having no right, title and interest in the suit land depicted in the site plan Ex.PW1/4 and a decree for per
Anathula Sudhakar Vs. P. Buchi Reddy (Dead) by LRs. and Ors. (2008) 4 SCC 594
M.K. Rappai and Ors. Vs John and Ors. (1969) 2 SCC 590
Pt. Chet Ram Vashist (Dead) by LRs. Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
Raju S. Jethmalani and Others Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others (2005) 11 SCC 222
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.