VALMIKI J.MEHTA
AVNIJA AHLUWALIA (MINOR) – Appellant
Versus
BIKRAMJIT AHLUWALIA – Respondent
IA No.13260/2012 (under Order VII Rule 11 CPC)
1. The defendants have filed the present application seeking rejection of the plaint.
2. At the outset, I must note that for deciding this application this Court has consciously ignored the averments made in this application under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) which are on merits and which dispute and deny the existence of the HUF. This is because when an application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC is considered, the contents of the plaint are deemed to be correct. Also, in the application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, it is noticed that defences on merits have been taken up, and which defences can only be the subject matter of the contents of the written statement, and which cannot be the basis of an application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.
3. Let us therefore, examine the pleading/plaint as to whether the plaint discloses a cause of action as distinguished from proving a cause of action and which will arise only at the stage of trial. When an application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC uses the expression “discloses a cause of action”, the expression pertains to the existence only of sufficient pleading with
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.