PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, PRATIBHA RANI
MS BINDU CHAUDHARY – Appellant
Versus
DEEPAK SUGA – Respondent
PRATIBHA RANI, J.
C.M. No. 9083/2015
1. For the reasons stated in the application, 135 days delay in filing the appeal is condoned.
2. The application is disposed of.
MAT. APP. (F.C.) No. 63/2015
1. The appellant/wife is in appeal seeking enhancement of maintenance, awarded vide order dated November 19, 2014, by the learned Judge, Family Court. While disposing of the application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, filed by her in HMA No. 200/2014, she has been granted maintenance of Rs. 5,000 per month in addition to Rs. 2,000 per Court visit towards her expenses for visit and Rs. 500 as DA per Court visit.
2. The respondent/husband filed a petition in the year 2013 seeking dissolution of marriage under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. On notice of the divorce petition being received, the appellant/wife filed an application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 seeking pendent-lite maintenance of Rs. 1 lac per month in addition to Rs. 15,000 per month towards travelling expenses for attending the Court proceedings from Solan, Himachal Pradesh to Delhi and Rs. 5,000/- per day during that time towards her lodging and boarding expenses in
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.