INDIRA BANERJEE, ANIL KUMAR CHAWLA
Nirmal Jain – Appellant
Versus
Ahuja Impex Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
Indira Banerjee, J.
1. This appeal is against a judgment and order dated 26.4.2016 passed by the learned Single Judge, in the application being I.A. 261 of 2016, under Order XXII Rule 4 (wrongly mentioned as Order XXII Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code for substitution of the Appellants as Defendants in the suit being C.S. (O.S.) 2017 of 2015 filed by the Respondent No.1, in place of the defendant No.4, who is dead.
2. By the impugned order, the learned Single Judge was pleased to convert the application filed by the Respondent No.1 under Order XXII Rule 3 as an application under Order VI Rule 17 for amendment of the plaint, allow the application and implead the Appellants as Defendants in the suit.
3. The Appellants filed the suit being C.S. (O.S.) 2017 of 2015 against M/s. Rockman Projects Ltd. impleaded Defendant No.1 and its directors, impleaded Defendant Nos. 2 to 5, for a decree of Rs.10,25,000,00/- (Rupees Ten Crore twenty five Lakhs) and other consequential reliefs. Mr. D. K. Jain, impleaded as Defendant No. 4, was already dead, when the suit was filed. The Defendant No.4 died on 13.03.2015. The suit was filed on or about 30.06.2015.
4. On or about 11.12.2015, the Pl
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.