SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Del) 25

BADAR DURREZ AHMED, ASHUTOSH KUMAR
P. K. Sen – Appellant
Versus
Exxon Mobile Corporation – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. S. Chakraborty
For the Respondents: Ms. Anuradha Salhotra, Mr. Yatin Grover

JUDGMENT :

Badar Durrez Ahmed, J.

1. The present appeal raises the question of territorial jurisdiction of this court in entertaining the suit filed by the respondents. The appeal arises out of the judgment and/or order dated 22.07.2016 delivered/passed by a learned single Judge of this court in IA No.20626/2015 which was filed by the appellant herein (defendant) under Order VII Rule 10 and Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the CPC’). The application was dismissed and the learned single Judge held that this court had territorial jurisdiction to entertain the suit which was one of infringement of trademark.

2. Before we proceed any further, it would be appropriate to identify the parties. The respondent No.1 was the first plaintiff and is a corporation/company incorporated in USA. It has no office in India and by itself does not carry on any business in India. It is the registered proprietor of the trademark ‘EXXON’ in respect of various goods and services. The respondent No.2/plaintiff No.2 is said to be a wholly owned subsidiary




































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top