SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Del) 4409

ASHUTOSH KUMAR
Subhadara – Appellant
Versus
Vijender Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Vipin K. Singh

JUDGMENT :

Ashutosh Kumar, J.

CM Appln. 30880 of 2016 in Rev. Pet. 380 of 2016; CM Appln. 31675 of 2016 in Rev. Pet. 390 of 2016; & CM Appln. 31672 of 2016 in Rev. Pet. 389 of 2016

1. Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. The applications stand disposed of.

CM Appln. 30882 of 2016 in Rev. Pet. 380 of 2016; CM Appln. 31677 of 2016 in Rev. Pet. 390 of 2016; & CM Appln. 31674 of 2016 in Rev. Pet. 389 of 2016

1. The present applications are for condonation of delay in filing the review petitions.

2. For the reasons stated in the applications, the delay in filing the review petitions is condoned.

3. The applications stand disposed of.

CM Appln. 30881 of 2016 in Rev. Pet. 380 of 2016 CM Appln. 31676 of 2016 in Rev. Pet. 390 of 2016; & CM Appln. 31673 of 2016 in Rev. Pet. 389 of 2016

1. The present application are for condonation of delay in re-filing the review petitions.

2. For the reasons stated in the applications, the delay in re-filing the review petitions is condoned.

3. The applications stand disposed of.

Review Petition 380, 390 & 389 of 2016

1. Heard Mr. Vipin Kumar Singh, the learned counsel for the revisionist.

2. The revisionist/petitioner seeks review of the composite judg








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top