ASHUTOSH KUMAR
Subhadara – Appellant
Versus
Vijender Singh – Respondent
Ashutosh Kumar, J.
CM Appln. 30880 of 2016 in Rev. Pet. 380 of 2016; CM Appln. 31675 of 2016 in Rev. Pet. 390 of 2016; & CM Appln. 31672 of 2016 in Rev. Pet. 389 of 2016
1. Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2. The applications stand disposed of.
CM Appln. 30882 of 2016 in Rev. Pet. 380 of 2016; CM Appln. 31677 of 2016 in Rev. Pet. 390 of 2016; & CM Appln. 31674 of 2016 in Rev. Pet. 389 of 2016
1. The present applications are for condonation of delay in filing the review petitions.
2. For the reasons stated in the applications, the delay in filing the review petitions is condoned.
3. The applications stand disposed of.
CM Appln. 30881 of 2016 in Rev. Pet. 380 of 2016 CM Appln. 31676 of 2016 in Rev. Pet. 390 of 2016; & CM Appln. 31673 of 2016 in Rev. Pet. 389 of 2016
1. The present application are for condonation of delay in re-filing the review petitions.
2. For the reasons stated in the applications, the delay in re-filing the review petitions is condoned.
3. The applications stand disposed of.
Review Petition 380, 390 & 389 of 2016
1. Heard Mr. Vipin Kumar Singh, the learned counsel for the revisionist.
2. The revisionist/petitioner seeks review of the composite judg
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.