MANMOHAN, J:

1. Petitioners, who are allottees under the Expandable Housing Scheme, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as “Scheme, 1996”) challenge non-issuance of fresh Demand-cum-Allotment Letters. In fact, the petitioners seek Demand-cum-Allotment letters at the same rate/cost, as issued in 2014-15 to the other allottees of the Scheme, 1996.

2. The relevant facts of the present cases are that in 1996, the petitioners had applied for allotment of flats under the Scheme, 1996.

3. On 31st March, 1997, draw of lots was held and the petitioners were allotted flats. In 1998, Demand-cum-Allotment letters were issued to the petitioners. However, some of the petitioners challenged the demands raised in the said letters.

4. A Coordinate Bench of this Court in Raj Kumar Vs. Delhi Development Authority, CWP 2142/1999 decided on 27 November, 2003 repelled the challenge to the upward revision in the disposal cost, but directed the petitioners to choose an option between payment of consideration for the allotted flat at the current cost within forty-five days from the date of the judgment or to make payment of the original cost with interest @12% p.a. on the 50% of the amount from the date of