SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.

1. The petitioner impugns order dated 14.09.2016, passed by the Central Information Commission, whereby, the case of the petitioner has been decided in terms of order dated 29.07.2016 in an earlier decided case No.CIC/SA/A/2016/001672.

2. The petitioner, who appears in person, submits that the said case, on the basis of which the impugned order has been passed, pertains to an RTI application with regard to the Mosque at Darya Ganj, whereas, the present appeal pertains to an RTI application with regard to (1) Madni Jasjid, (2) Masjid Amina Firdose, (3) Masjid Bhag Wali, (4) Masjid & Madarsa and (5) Masjid Chand Tara Wali New Sanjay Amar Colony, which is completely different from the other application which was filed by the petitioner.

3. It is contended that the two applications are completely different and different replies have been received. He submits that the decision in the case, referred to by the CIC, does not operate as res judicata or issue estoppel insofar as the present petition is concerned.

4. Issue notice. Notice is accepted by the learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.1. With the consent of learned counsel for the respondent No.1,