Manmohan, J.

1. At the outset, the petitioner who appears in person, prays for an adjournment on the ground that his counsel who was available before lunch, is not available now.

2. Learned counsel for respondents vehemently objects to the adjournment. He points out that on the last two dates also, either the petitioner or his counsel had taken an adjournment.

3. Keeping in view the aforesaid fact, this Court was inclined to admit the matter on the ground that the petitioner was not showing any urgency to argue the case. At that stage, petitioner stated that he wishes to argue his own case.

4. Consequently, petitioner has been heard at length as well as the learned counsel for the respondents.

5. It is pertinent to mention that the present contempt petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of the Division Bench order dated 07th March, 2011 on the ground that the petitioner has been denied pension and illegal deductions have been made on various accounts like non-handing over of library books.

6. With this statement, petitioner handed over one book to learned counsel for the respondents in Court. When the petitioner was informed that a book could not be returned in th