G.S.SISTANI, SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL
MUKESH – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
1. Since the present appeals arise out of a common judgment, the same have been heard together and are being disposed of by a common judgment.
2. Present appeals arise out of a judgment dated 17.12.2012 and order on sentence dated 17.12.2012 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No. 60/10, by virtue of which all the appellants have been convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 20,000/- and in default of the payment of fine to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for one month. The appellant Vasu Sharma @ Bunty was further sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years and to pay a fine of Rs. 20,000/- for the offence punishable under Section 25 and 27 of the Arms Act and in default of payment of fine to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for one month. Both the sentences in respect of the appellant Vasu Sharma @ Bunty were ordered to run concurrently.
3. The brief facts of the case are as under:
“The formal indictment against the accused persons is that, on 19.07.2010, at about 2.00 pm in Gali no.2, near House No. 1716, J-Block, Bh
Dhanaj Singh vs. State of Punjab reported in AIR 2004 SC 1920
Jaffar @ Raju Vs. State reported in 2013 (2) JCC 1175
Jandel Singh vs. State of Madhya Pradesh reported in 2003 (9) SCC 110
Kalicharan Vs. State reported in 2015 (2) JCC 1304.
Prem Singh Vs. State of Haryana reported in (2013) 14 SCC 88
State of H.P. v. Jai Lal and Ors.
Shabbir Vs. State reported in 2007 (98) DRJ 137
State of Rajasthan Vs. Teja Singh reported in 2001 (3) SCC 147
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.