SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Del) 734

JAYANT NATH
LEELA DEVI – Appellant
Versus
SUMIT BATRA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Abdul Sattar
For the Respondents: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia

JUDGMENT :

JAYANT NATH, J.

1. The present Revision Petition is filed under section 115 CPC seeking to impugn the decree/order dated 25.8.2014 passed by the trial court under section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. The respondent/plaintiff filed a suit for possession under section 6 of the Specific Relief Act regarding property No. C-63, DDA Flats, Kalkaji, Delhi and other connected reliefs. It was contended in the plaint by the respondent that on 21.2.2012 he entered into a lease for a period of five years w.e.f. 1.3.2012 to 28.2.2017 from the owner of the suit property Shri Kuldeep Sharma vide registered lease agreement dated 21.2.2012 (Ex.PW1/2) duly registered with the office of Sub Registrar. It is further stated that pursuant to the lease agreement the said Shri Kuldeep Sharma handed over vacant peaceful possession of the suit property to the respondent. The receipt-cum-possession letter dated 6.3.2012 is Ex.PW1/3. It is further stated that after taking peaceful possession of the property, the respondent got it cleaned for the purpose of renovation and whitewashing. He did not shift immediately. He went out to fetch an electrician, plumber and painter after locking the premi























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top