I.S.MEHTA
DILIP KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
SUNITA MITTAL – Respondent
I.S. MEHTA, J.
1. The instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is preferred by the petitioner against the impugned order dated 23.08.2014 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge Cum Special Judge-II, CBI Rohini Courts: Delhi in criminal revision No. 25/14 wherein the learned ASJ disposed of the petition directing against the order dated 24.05.2014 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate in complaint case No. 1555/1/12 titled as Ms. Sunita Mittal vs. Dilip Kumar @ Raju & Ors.
2. The brief facts stated are that Ms. Sunita Mittal present respondent/complainant filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 on 08.08.2012 qua against Dilip Kumar the present petitioner and two other persons, i.e. Iqbal Chand and Vicky Kumar.
3. The basis of the complaint under Section 138 NI Act was that the petitioner had issued six post dated cheques in favour of the respondent in furtherance of the loan agreement dated 24.10.2011 for Rs. 1,43,00,000/- (Rupees One Crore Forty Three Lacs Only). However, the said cheques were dishonoured on presentation. Thereafter the respondent issued legal demand notices dated 14.07.2012 to the petitioner and when th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.