SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Del) 397

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SANJIV KHANNA and CHANDER SHEKHAR, JJ.
UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS – Petitioners
Versus
MANJU VASHISTHA & OTHERS – Respondents
WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No. 11826 of 2016
Decided On : 03-02-2017

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Devesh Singh, Mr. Vinod Kumar Bhati

Headnote:

MACP Scheme - Financial Upgradation - Paragraphs 1, 9, 22, and 28 of the MACP Scheme - The court discussed the MACP Scheme and its relevant paragraphs, emphasizing the conditions for financial upgradations and the interpretation of 'regular service' and 'continuous regular service' under the scheme. The court highlighted the independence of the conditions for financial upgradations and the erroneous interpretation by the petitioners and the Department of Personnel and Training (DoP&T). The court also referred to the Assured Career Promotion Scheme to support its reasoning.

Fact of the Case:

The respondents, appointed as Head Constable (Ministerial) in the Delhi Police, were granted second financial upgradation under the MACP Scheme but had the third financial upgradation withdrawn by the petitioners. The petitioners disputed the respondents' entitlement to the third financial upgradation, arguing that it could only be granted after completion of 30 years of overall service in the regular grade from the date of initial appointment.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioners' argument overlooked the MACP Scheme's stipulations and that the DoP&T's interpretation was erroneous. The court held that the respondents were entitled to the third financial upgradation after completing 20 years in the same grade pay at the promotional post or 30 years of overall service. The court dismissed the writ petition, emphasizing the need for uniform treatment of employees under the MACP Scheme.

Issues: The main issue was the entitlement of the respondents to the third financial upgradation under the MACP Scheme, based on the interpretation of the scheme's conditions and the erroneous understanding by the petitioners and the DoP&T.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the interpretation of the MACP Scheme, emphasizing the independence of the conditions for financial upgradations and the need for uniform treatment of employees. The court also referred to the Assured Career Promotion Scheme to support its reasoning.

Final Decision: The court dismissed the writ petition, holding that the respondents were entitled to the third financial upgradation under the MACP Scheme and emphasizing the need for uniform treatment of employees under the scheme.

JUDGMENT :

SANJIV KHANNA, J.

The Union of India, the Commissioner of Police, and four others in this writ petition impugn the order dated 23rd May, 2016 passed by the Principal Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal, for short) in OA No. 1288/2014 holding that the respondents, 17 in number, were entitled to grant of benefit of third financial upgradation under the Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme (MACP Scheme, for short).

2. The respondents were appointed as Head Constable (Ministerial) in the Delhi Police on different dates in 1984, 1985 and 1986. They were promoted as Assistant Sub-Inspector (Ministerial) again on different dates. After the introduction of the MACP Scheme, the respondents were granted second financial upgradation under the said scheme with effect from 1st September 2008. Grant of second financial upgradation is not challenged and disputed. The respondents were thereafter granted the third financial upgradation once they had completed 20 years of regular service from the date of first promotion, though they had not completed 30 years of service from the date of direct entry. Grant of the third financial upgradation was withdrawn by the petitioners vide order dated 10th March, 2014. The respondents challenged this withdrawal in OA No. 1288/2014, which as recorded above, has been allowed by the impugned order.

3. The petitioners dispute the respondents' entitlement to the third financial upgradation under the MACP Scheme contending that the third financial upgradation could only be granted after completion of 30 years of overall service in the regular grade from the date of initial appointment and not after 20 years of service from the date of first promotion as was the case and contention of the respondents. We proceed to examine the said argument.

4. The MACP Scheme was introduced for the Central Government Civilian Employees, except organized Group A services vide Office Memorandum No. 35034/3/2008-Estt.(D) dated 19th May, 2009. The Scheme was operational with effect from 1st September, 2008. Paragraphs 1, 9, 22, and the illustrations given in paragraph 28 of the MACP Scheme are relevant and are, therefore, reproduced below:-

“1. There shall be three financial upgradations under the MACPS, counted from the direct entry grade on completion of 10, 20 and 30 years service respectively. Financial upgradation under the Scheme will be admissible whenever a person has spent 10 years continuously in the same grade-pay.

XXXXX

9. 'Regular service' for the purposes of the MACPS shall commence from the date of joining of a post in direct entry grade on a regular basis either on direct recruitment basis or on absorption/re-employment basis. Service rendered on adhoc/contract basis before regular appointment on pre-appointment training shall not be taken into reckoning. However, past continuous regular service in another Government Department in a post carrying same grade pay prior to regular appointment in a new Department, without a break, shall also be counted towards qualifying regular service for the purposes of MACPS only (and not for the regular promotions). However, benefits under the MACPS in such cases shall not be considered till the satisfactory completion of the probation period in the new post.

XXXXX

22. If Group "A" Government employee, who was not covered under the ACP Scheme has now become entitled to say third financial upgradation directly, having completed 30 year's regular service, his pay shall be fixed successively in next three immediate higher grade pays in the hierarchy of revised pay-bands and grade pays allowing the benefit of 3% pay fixation at every stage. Pay of persons becoming eligible for second financial upgradation may also be fixed accordingly.

28. Illustrations

A (i) lf a Government servant (LDC) in PB-l in the Grade Pay of Rs.1900 gets his first regular promotion






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top