SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Del) 528

PRATIBHA RANI
MEENU – Appellant
Versus
BIRMA DEVI – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr.Vijay Kinger and Mr.Sanjay Verma, Advocates.

JUDGMENT

1. The appellant has filed this Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure impugning the concurrent findings of the Courts below i.e. order dated 01st October, 2016 passed by the First Appellate Court and order dated 23rd May, 2016 passed by learned Trial Court. The appellant has questioned the legality and validity of the order of the learned Trial Court dated 23rd May, 2016 whereby a decree under Order XII Rule 6 CPC for possession in respect of property House No.235, Khasra No.60, Near MCD School, Sabha Pur, Karawal Nagar, Delhi-110094 has been passed against her by the learned Trial Court and she has been directed to vacate the suit property and also restrained from creating any third party interest in the suit property.

2. Learned counsel for the appellant has filed the brief written synopsis and has also made oral submissions raising the following contentions:

(i) The Civil Court has no jurisdiction to adjudicate the family matters between the parties as per Section 7 and other provisions of the Family Court Act, 1984.

(ii) The Civil Court cannot overwrite the provisions of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.

(iii) The Civil Court

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top