SUNIL GAUR
National Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Menka Lidhoo – Respondent
1. In the above-captioned first appeal, reduction in quantum of compensation awarded is sought by Insurer whereas in the above-captioned second appeal, its enhancement is sought by Claimant-injured. Both the appeals arise out of common impugned Award of 15th April, 2008 which grants compensation of Rs.42,30,000/- including the interim Award with interest @ 9% per annum on account of injuries sustained by Claimant-Menka in a road accident on 16th June, 2002. The facts, as noted in impugned Award, need no reproduction. Suffice to note that apart from evidence of Claimant, there is evidence of Dr. Rajendra Prasad who has proved the medical record and the Claimant has also got examined other witnesses regarding her employment, salary, etc. No evidence was led by the Insurer. On the basis of evidence led, impugned Award has been rendered by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as Tribunal). Learned Tribunal has assessed ‘Loss of earning capacity’ at Rs.37,80,000/- by adding 50% towards ‘future prospects’ and by applying multiplier of 18. Amount of Rs.1 l
Dinesh Singh v. Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Limited & Anr. (2014) 9 SCC 241
Kavita v. Deepak & Ors. (2012) 8 SCC 604
Reshma Kumari & Ors. v. Madan Mohan & Anr. (2013) 9 SCC 65
Sanjay Verma v. Haryana Roadways
Smt. Sarla Verma & ors. v. Delhi Transport Corporation & Anr.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.