VALMIKI J.MEHTA
ASHOK KUMAR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
UNIVERSITY OF DELHI – Respondent
1. By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner impugns the reports dated 30.6.2015 & 12.2.2016 submitted by the Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) of the respondent no. 2/Dayal Singh Evening College. The ICC was constituted under the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), on account of complaints against the petitioner of the respondent nos. 3 to 5 in this writ petition.
2. On behalf of the petitioner these reports are challenged on two counts. First count is that the report only gives a prima facie conclusion of the complaints having substance without the report actually giving a definite conclusion and holding the charges against the petitioner to be proved, and which aspects are very much required under Section 13(3) of the Act. The second count is that the two reports dated 30.6.2015 as regards the complaints of respondent nos. 4 and 5, in such inquiry proceedings, the petitioner was not allowed to lead evidence in support of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.