VALMIKI J.MEHTA
SHAILENDRA PATHAK – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
1. By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner/Sh. Shailendra Pathak seeks appointment to the post of Assistant Registrar with the respondent no.2/University of Delhi. Petitioner seeks appointment to the post of Assistant Registrar with the respondent no.2/University of Delhi under the Persons with Disabilities (PWD) quota. Also, it is not that the petitioner seeks appointment to the post under the PWD quota on the ground that he has been wrongly not selected, because petitioner admits that the respondent no.5/Sh. Pradeep Kumar who has been appointed in the PWD quota has received more marks i.e. 276 marks whereas the petitioner has obtained 268 marks, but what the petitioner pleads and argues is that the respondent no.5/Sh. Pradeep Kumar though he only applied for the post of Assistant Registrar in the PWD category, and was selected in the PWD category, respondent no.5/Sh. Pradeep Kumar was also otherwise an OBC person, and though respondent no.5/Sh. Pradeep Kumar did not apply as an OBC candidate, yet respondent no.5/Sh. Pradeep Kumar should be selected to the post of Assistant Registrar not in the PWD category but in t
R.K. Sabharwal and Others Vs. State of Punjab and Others (1995) 2 SCC 745
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.