SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Del) 1129

JAYANT NATH
ICICI BANK LTD. – Appellant
Versus
SHYAM PAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Puneet K. Bhalla and Mr. Kashish Narang, Advocates.

JUDGMENT :

JAYANT NATH, J.

CM No.13466/2017 (Exemption)

Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

CM(M) 376/2017

1. An advance copy of the petition has been sent to the respondents but none is present on behalf of the respondents.

2. By the present petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner seeks to impugn the order dated 21.01.2017 of the trial court by which order the trial court dismissed the application under Order 40 Rule 1 CPC for appointment of a Receiver.

3. The petitioner has filed a suit for recovery of Rs.2,72,542.77/-in connection with a vehicle loan. The vehicle that was bought, namely, Maruti Wagon R/ LXI bearing registration No. DL-8CAG-4420 also stands hypothecated to the petitioner bank. As per the petitioner, the respondents were to pay the loan amount in 59 EMIs of Rs.6,090/- towards repayment of the loan amount of Rs.2,75,000/-. He has defaulted in six EMIs of Rs.36,540/- plus other charges. On account of default, the petitioner recalled the loan facility by sending a recall notice dated 11.07.2016. Along with the plaint the petitioner filed an application for appointment of a receiver relying upon the judgment of this cour


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top