SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Del) 1128

JAYANT NATH
ICICI BANK LTD. – Appellant
Versus
MARSHAL OVERSEAS PVT. LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Puneet K. Bhalla and Mr. Kashish Narang, Advocates.

JUDGMENT :

JAYANT NATH, J.

CM No.13440/2017 (Exemption)

Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

CM(M) 374/2017

1. An advance copy of the petition has been sent to the respondents but none is present on behalf of the respondents.

2. By the present petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner seeks to impugn the order dated 21.01.2017 of the trial court by which order the trial court dismissed the application under Order 40 Rule 1 CPC for appointment of a Receiver.

3. The petitioner has filed a suit for recovery of Rs.2,22,204.62/- in connection with a vehicle loan. The vehicle that was bought, namely, Honda Civic/1.8 S MT bearing registration No. DL-3CBE-0445 also stands hypothecated to the petitioner bank. As per the petitioner, the respondents were to pay the loan amount in 25 EMIs of Rs.14,083/- towards repayment of the loan amount of Rs.2,93,550/-. He has defaulted in four EMIs of Rs.56,273/- plus other charges. Along with the plaint the petitioner filed an application for appointment of a receiver relying upon the judgment of this court dated 21.12.2016 passed in CM(M) 1333/2016 titled as “ICICI Bank Ltd. vs. Ram Chandra Yadav”.

4. The tria

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top