SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Del) 1314

VALMIKI J.MEHTA
ADESH JAIN – Appellant
Versus
TOP SINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Sugriva Dubey.

JUDGMENT :

VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J.

C.M. No. 16713/2017 (delay)

For the reasons stated in the application, delay in filing the appeal is condoned. CM stands disposed of.

C.M. No. 16714/2017 (exemption)

Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions.

C.M. stands disposed of.

FAO No. 205/2017 & CM No. 16712/2017 (stay)

1. This first appeal is filed under Section 30 of the Employee’s Compensation Act, 1923 impugning the judgment of the Employee’s Compensation Commissioner allowing the claim petition filed by the respondent herein. Claim petition was filed by the respondent on account of his suffering injury due to electrocution while working at the site.

2. The facts of the case are that the respondent filed the claim petition pleading that he was an employee of appellant nos. 2 and 3 and who were awarded a contract for doing POP work at the site of the appellant no. 1. Respondent pleaded that he was working as a helper for doing POP work of appellant nos. 2 and 3 since 21.7.2015 on wages of Rs.200/- per day. On 25.7.2015 respondent suffered injury due to electrocution while working at the site 641-C, Loni Road, Ram Nagar, Delhi. He was taken to the GTB Hospital by co-workers. Since appellant nos. 2









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top