S.RAVINDRA BHAT, I.S.MEHTA
AMEET LALCHAND SHAH – Appellant
Versus
RISHABH ENTERPRISES – Respondent
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.
1. This appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) is directed against an order of the learned single Judge declining an application under Section 8 (of the Act) to refer the subject matter of the suit filed by the respondent/plaintiffs to arbitration.
2. The brief facts are that on 01.02.2012, M/s Juwi India Renewable Energies P. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Juwi’) entered into two agreements with the first respondent (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Rishabh’), the sole proprietorship concern of the second plaintiff i.e. Dr. A.M. Singhvi. The two agreements entered into on 01.02.2012 were, one, for the purchase of power generating equipments to the tune of Rs. 8,89,80,730/- and the other for installation and commissioner of the plant for Rs. 2,20,19,270/-. Both these agreements contained arbitration clause.
3. On 05.03.2012, the plaintiff entered into Sale and Purchase Agreement dated 5th March, 2012 with the second defendant company (Astonfield) for purchasing CIS Photovoltaic Products to be leased to defendant No.3 company (Dante) and installed at the said power plant at Jhansi
Chloro Controls India Private Ltd. vs. Severn Trent Water Purification Inc.
N. Radhakrishnan vs. Maestro Engineers
Sukanya Holdings Pvt. Ltd. vs. Jayesh H. Pandya reported as (2003) 5 SCC 531
Union of India vs. Birla Cotton Spinning and Weaving Mills Ltd. reported as AIR 1967 SC 688
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.