VALMIKI J.MEHTA
CANARA BANK – Appellant
Versus
LUTHRA INDUSTRIES – Respondent
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J.
C.M. Appl. No. 10598/2017 (for exemption)
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
C.M. stands disposed of.
EX.F.A. 5/2017 and C.M. Appl. No. 10597/2017 (for stay)
1. This execution first appeal is filed by the appellant/decree holder/bank impugning the judgment of the executing court dated 21.1.2017 which has dismissed the execution petition filed by the appellant/bank on two counts. The first count for dismissing of the execution petition is that there is settlement and satisfaction of the decree in terms of One Time Settlement (OTS) offer accepted by the appellant/bank and the second count is that a decree cannot be executable against an immovable property, inasmuch as, the immovable property is a residential property and hence exempted from attachment in Delhi under Section 60(1) (ccc) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC). Reference to the judgment debtors in this case is reference to the legal heirs of original judgment debtor no. 2/defendant no. 2/Mr. Rajindra Kumar Malhotra.
2. Admittedly, the appellant/bank received a sum of Rs.6,25,000/- in terms of the OTS offer given by the judgment debtors. This OTS offer to the appellant/bank wa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.