SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Del) 1284

VALMIKI J.MEHTA
CHHOTEY LAL – Appellant
Versus
MANOHAR LAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Jagat Rana
For the Respondents: Mr. V.P. Rana

JUDGMENT :

VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J.

1. This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the appellants/defendants impugning the concurrent judgments of the courts below; of the Trial Court dated 31.8.2005 and the First Appellate Court dated 11.4.2008; by which the suit for injunction filed by the respondents/plaintiffs was decreed and appellants/defendants were restrained from interfering within peaceful possession of the suit land admeasuring 311 sq. yds. forming part of Khasra No. 304/2014, extended abadi of Village Bawana, Delhi.

2. The facts of the case are that the respondents/plaintiffs filed the subject suit for permanent injunction claiming ownership rights in the suit land. It was pleaded that the suit land was originally owned jointly by the ancestors of the parties. It was pleaded that since the predecessor-in-interest of the respondents/plaintiffs was the half owner of the total suit land admeasuring 750 sq. yds. situated in Khasra No. 304/2014, hence the predecessor-in-interest of the respondents/plaintiffs was given possession of 375 sq. yds. of the land. Out of this 375 sq. yds. some of the land was encroached upon by some




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top