IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.
PINKI KUMARI – Petitioner
Versus
STATE ELECTION COMMISSION AND ANR. – Respondents
CM.NO. 13387 of 2017 in W.P.(C) 3066 of 2017
Decided On : 11-04-2017
Bairwa - Rejection of Nomination Papers - The Schedule to the Constitution (Scheduled Castes) (Union Territories) Order 1951 - [S.Pushpa (2005) 3 SCC 1, Deepak Kumar (W.P.(C) 5390/2010)] - The court discussed the interpretation of the Scheduled Castes Order 1951 and its applicability to the petitioner's caste 'Bairwa'. The court also considered the jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 226 in electoral matters and the provisions of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner's nomination papers for contesting the election for Councilors of South Delhi Municipal Corporation were rejected on the ground that her caste 'Bairwa' does not fall under Part I of The Schedule to the Constitution (Scheduled Castes) (Union Territories) Order 1951.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the rejection of the nomination papers and the issue of the petitioner's caste fell under the jurisdiction of the election petition presented to the court of the district judge of Delhi, as per the provisions of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957.
Issues: The issues included the interpretation of the Scheduled Castes Order 1951, the jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 226 in electoral matters, and the provisions of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the matter of rejection of nomination papers should be addressed through an election petition as per the provisions of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957, and that the jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 226 was excluded in electoral matters.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the application, stating that the petitioner was not entitled to the relief as prayed for in the application.
CM NO. 13387/2017
1. By this order, I shall dispose of the CM 13387/2017 wherein the petitioner has sought the following prayers:
(a) issue a writ of certiorari and / or any other appropriate writ, thereby quashing/setting aside the impugned order dated 06.04.2017 passed by the Respondent no.2 thereby rejecting the nomination paper of petitioner for contesting election for Councilors of South Delhi Municipal Corporation, Ward No.67-S (lado Sarai); and
(b) issue a writ of mandamus and / or any other appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus thereby directing the Respondent no.2 to accept the nomination papers of the petitioner for contesting the election for Councilors of South Delhi Municipal Corporation, Ward No. 67-S (Lado Sarai); and
(c) Pass such other further orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.
and your petitioner, as is duty bound, shall ever pray.”
2. The challenge in the writ petition is to the order dated April 6, 2017, whereby the respondent No. 2 has rejected the nomination papers of the petitioner on the ground that the name of her caste “ Bairwa” does not fall under Part I of The Schedule to the Constitution (Scheduled Castes) (Union Territories) Order 1951.
3. It is the case of the petitioner that a Scheduled Caste Certificate of ‘Bairwa’ caste was issued to the petitioner by Delhi Government on March 21, 2009. On April 3, 2017, the petitioner was nominated as a candidate by the Bhartiya Janta Party for the South Delhi Municipal Corporation from Ward No. 67-S, Lado Sarai, New Delhi. On April 3, 2017, the petitioner filed her nomination form along with prescribed affidavit. After checking the nomination papers, the Returning Officer approved her as the candidate of Bhartiya Janta Party from the aforesaid ward. By order dated April 6, 2017, the respondent No. 2- Returning Officer rejected the nomination paper of petitioner inter alia, on the ground which has already been stated above.
4. Mr. Chetan Sharma, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the order of the Returning Officer is untenable in view of the settled position of law in terms of the judgments of the Supreme Court in the case of S.Pushpa and Ors. Vs. Sivachanmugavelu And Others (2005) 3 SCC 1 and Full Bench of this Court in Deepak Kumar and Ors. Vs. District and Sessions Judge, Delhi and Ors. W.P.(C) 5390/2010 and Connected Writ Petitions, decided on September 12, 2012.
5. He states that, in view of the ratio of the judgment of the Supreme Court in S.Pushpa (supra) and the Full Bench judgment in Deepak Kumar and Ors. (supra) even if the ‘Bairwa’ caste is not a Scheduled Caste in terms of the Part I of the Schedule to the Constitution (Scheduled Caste) Union Territories Order 1951 (in short ‘Order of 1951’), still, the petitioner would be entitled to be considered as a Scheduled Caste in Delhi.
6. He states, the caste certificate issued on March 21, 2009, was after proper verification from the State of Rajasthan from where the certificate of the father of the petitioner was issued.
7. On the other hand, Mr. Pushkarna, learned counsel for the respondents would submit that the present petition is not maintainable inasmuch as in terms of Section 8 of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 (in short ‘Act of 1957’), in the case of a Reserved seat, for the Scheduled Caste, a person shall not be so qualified unless he is also a member of any of the said caste. He also refers to Section 2(53) (Act of 1957) to contend Schedule Caste means, “any of the Schedule Caste specified in Part I of the Schedule to the Order 1951. He would refer to a communication addressed to the Returning Officer of all wards by the State Election Commission, whereby, a copy of the Order of 1951 was sent for information and which does not depict ‘Bairwa’ as a Scheduled Caste in Delhi. According to him, a notification for election to the South Delhi Municipal Corporation was issued on Marc
Anugrah Narain Singh Vs. State of U.P. and Ors.
Jyoti Basu and Ors. Debi Ghoshal and Ors.
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.