VALMIKI J.MEHTA
SANJEEV KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J.
1. By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners seek the application of doctrine of “equal pay for equal work” by treating the petitioners who are employees of the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS)/respondent nos.2 to 4 as to be similarly placed with the similar employees of Government of India and thus for petitioners to be paid the same pay-scales as granted to similarly placed central government employees.
2. Originally there were total of seven petitioners. Petitioner no.1 has not pressed the writ petition, and therefore, the writ petition has to be decided so far as petitioner nos.2 to 7 are concerned. These petitioner nos.2 to 7 were appointed by the employer/respondent nos.2 to 4, and they are working at the following posts:-
| “(1) Pet. No.2 | Junior Operator (Printing) | 950-1500 | 1350-2200 |
| (2) Pet. No.3 | Offset Machine | 950-1500 | 1350-2200 |
| (3) Pet. No.4 | Junior Op | ||
Harbans Lal and Others Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and Others (1989) 4 SCC 459
Indian Road Constn. Corpn. Ltd. Vs. K.P. Grover & Ors. 78(1999) DLT 691
Official Liquidator vs. Dayanand and Others (2008) 10 SCC 1
S.C. Chandra and Others Vs. State of Jharkhand and Others (2007) 8 SCC 279
State of Punjab and Others Vs. Jagjit Singh and Others (2017) 1 SCC 148
State of Mizoram & Anr. Vs. Mizoram Engineering Service Association & Anr. AIR 2004 SC 3644
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.