SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Del) 1731

ASHUTOSH KUMAR
ABID – Appellant
Versus
STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Shrikant Tyagi.
For the Respondent: Ms. Neelam Sharma, APP.

JUDGMENT :

ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J.

1. Both the criminal appeals have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.

2. Appellants Abid and Imtiyaz @ Toe have been convicted under Sections 395 and 397 of the IPC and have been sentenced to undergo RI for 7 years, fine of Rs.5000/- and in default of payment of fine, SI for six months under both the counts by judgment and order dated 16.04.2015/20.04.2015 passed by the Special Judge, NDPS-2, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in S.C No.82/2011 arising out of FIR No.96/2011 (P.S.Timarpur) instituted for the offences under Sections 392/397/412 and 34 of the IPC read with Section 27 of the Arms Act. The sentences have been ordered to run concurrently.

3. On 04.05.2011 at about 5 AM, Munna Prasad (PW-1) and Sandeep Kumar (PW-3) were divested of their belongings including wallet containing money and other documents on point of knife by the miscreants. FIR was lodged by Munna Prasad (PW-1) alleging that while he and PW-3 were going to distribute newspapers, they were intercepted by three miscreants. They were caught hold of and on point of knife, they were divested of their belongings. The miscreants were riding a moto
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top