SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Del) 1508

PRATIBHA RANI
SHITIJE JAIN – Appellant
Versus
BALBIR SINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Vikrant Bhardwaj, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

CM No.18638/2017

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

Application stands disposed of.

CM(M) 547/2017

1. The petitioner has invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India by assailing the order dated 31st March, 2017 whereby the application filed by him for his impleadment in RCA No.61245/2016 titled as Balbir Singh Vs. Padam Chand Jain has been dismissed.

2. Perusal of the record reveals that Civil Suit No. 55/2014 was filed by Sh.Padam Chand Jain seeking a decree of possession against the tenant Sh.Balbir Singh claiming himself to be the landlord and joint owner of the suit property bearing no.E-2/4, Main Bazar Road, Shastri Nagar, Delhi-110052 along with Ms. Seema Jain. As per the averments made by the plaintiff, Sh.Padam Chand Jain the defendant/tenant Sh.Balbir Singh was inducted as a tenant in respect of a hall (shown in red colour in the site plan) on the ground floor of the suit property vide rent deed dated 1st June, 2000. The rate of rent was Rs.10,000/- per month. The tenancy was terminated vide notice dated 19th May, 2006 and thereafter, the suit for possession was filed.

3. The suit filed by the plaintiff was decr
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top