ASHUTOSH KUMAR
VEENA – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J.
1. The appellant/complainant is aggrieved by the judgment dated 29.11.2016 passed in Crl.Appeal No.1216/2016 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi whereby the judgment and order of the Trial Court dated 08.09.2016/01.10.2016 convicting the respondent under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentencing him to undergo SI for six months, to pay a compensation of Rs.3,00,000/- (Rs.3 lakhs) and in default of which to further undergo SI for six months, has been set aside and the respondent has been acquitted of all charges.
2. The appellant is said to have given Rs.5 lakhs to the respondent as family loan which was promised to be returned within two months. The complaint filed by the appellant inter-alia states that Rs.2 lakhs was paid to the appellant by the respondent towards the discharge of the liability against the aforesaid family loan. The cheque in question of Rs.3 lakhs, i.e. the balance amount, when presented before the bank by the appellant, was dishonoured because of insufficiency of funds. A legal notice dated 15.04.2009 was sent through registered A.D post and UPC on 17.04.2009. Since
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.