RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION – Appellant
Versus
HARI KISHAN – Respondent
1. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugns the order [dated 26th October, 2012 in Ex.No.305/08/02 of the Court of Additional Senior Civil Judge (ASCJ), (North), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi] of dismissal of two applications filed by the petitioner/judgment debtor, both under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC).
2. The petition was entertained and notice thereof issued. On 9th April, 2013, the counsel for the respondent No.1/decree holder stated that he will not get the judgment and decree under execution executed. The said statement continues to bind the respondent No.1/decree holder. Resultantly, the execution proceedings before the ASCJ remain stayed.
3. The counsels have been heard.
4. The respondent No.1/decree holder, in or about the year 1993, instituted a suit against the petitioner/judgment debtor/Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) for (i) declaration that the services of the respondent No.1/decree holder stood regularised since 1st May, 1981; (ii) for a direction to the petitioner/MCD to regularise the services of the respondent No.1/decree holder since 1st May, 1981; (iii) for a direction to the petitioner / MCD to pay
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.