Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
GITA MITTAL, C.HARI SHANKAR, JJ.
CRIME INVESTIGATION DETECTIVE TRUST - Petitioner
Versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS - Respondents
W.P.(C)No.6728/2016
Decided On : 06-09-2017
Illegal Parking - Authorization of Parking Sites - The court clarified the existence of authorized parking sites and the permissible parking areas, dismissing the petition based on the provided clarifications.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner complained about illegal parking controlled by parking mafia in Jasola District and the road along TDI centre. The South Delhi Municipal Corporation provided details of authorized parking sites under their control, clarifying the existence of authorized parking at specific spots.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the reference to specific plots was to enable identification, and the authorized parking was permitted along the road in front of these plots, as confirmed by the respondents and the allotment letter from the Delhi Development Authority.
Issues: The issue revolved around the petitioner's complaint of illegal parking and the clarification provided by the South Delhi Municipal Corporation regarding the authorized parking sites.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the clarification provided by the South Delhi Municipal Corporation, which established the existence of authorized parking sites and the permissible parking areas, leading to the dismissal of the petition.
Final Decision: The writ petition was disposed of based on the clarifications provided, indicating that the issue need not detain the court any further.
GITA MITTAL, J.
1. The petitioner had complained that illegal parking in and around Jasola District and the road along TDI centre had developed which is run and controlled by parking mafia. In this regard, our attention is drawn to the counter affidavit filed by the South Delhi Municipal Corporation setting out the details of authorized parking sites under their control. The SDMC has disclosed existence of authorized parking at the following three spots :
| S. No. | Parking Area | Possession | Company to which Possession is Granted | Date of Possession | Remarks |
| 1. | Jasola District Center Plot No.3,7,8 & 9 | YES | Shri Dharmender | 28.4.2016 | Authorised Parking |
| 2. | Mohan Co-operative | YES | M.S. Contractor | 16.3.2017 | Authorised Parking |
| 3. | Non-Hierarchical Commercial Center, Jasola | YES | Deepika Associates | 21.12.2016 | Authorised Parking |
2. Ld. counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no parking permissible on the plot nos.3, 7, 8, 9, Jasola District Centre. It is submitted by ld. counsel for the SDMC that reference to the plot, so far as the parking site is concerned, is to enable the identification. In fact, the parking is along the road in front of these plots where authorized parking has been permitted. This fact is confirmed by the respondent nos.3 and 4 in their counter affidavit dated 28th September, 2016 which have to be read along with the enclosed documents. It is also manifested from the allotment letter dated 25th April, 2016 “regarding parking site in front of Plot No.3 and in front of Plot No.7, 8 & 9, Distt. Centre Jasola” addressed by the Delhi Development Authority to the AE/Survey, DDA, Vikas Sadan, INA, New Delhi-110023 with copies addressed to the allottees.
3. In view of the above, the necessary clarifications have been provided and this writ petition need not detain us any further.
4. This writ petition is disposed of in the above terms.
AI
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
