RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
SUNIL ALAGH – Appellant
Versus
SHIVRAJ PURI – Respondent
IA No.6002/2017 of the defendants under Order XXXVII Rule 3(5) of the CPC).
1. The two defendants Shivraj Puri and Raghuraj Puri, in this suit under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) for recovery of Rs.9,15,00,000/-, pursuant to service (stated to be on 3rd April, 2017) of the summons for judgment, on 12th April, 2017 (re-filed on 12th May, 2017) filed this application for leave to defend with affidavits in support thereof of both the defendants.
2. The application though re-filed on 12th May, 2017 i.e. after more than seven days of the original filing on 12th April, 2017 is not accompanied with any application for condonation of delay in re-filing. Re-filing beyond seven days, in law is a fresh filing. The application filed on 12th May, 2017 is clearly beyond the time of ten days prescribed in Order XXXVII Rule 3(5) from stated date of service of the summons for judgment on 3rd April, 2017 and liable to be rejected on this ground alone. In fact on perusal of the office file it is found that the summons for judgment were served, at the address given in the Memo of Appearance, on the counsel for the defendants on 1st April, 2017. The first filing on 12t
Bhagwati Prasad Vs. Chandramaul
IDBI Trusteeship Services Ltd. Vs. Hubtown Ltd.
Texem Engineering Vs. Texcomash Exports
Wishwa Mittar Bajaj & Sons Vs. UOI
Premier Exports Vs. Hindustan Cold Storage
Central Inland Water Transport Corporation Limited Vs. Brojo Nath Ganguly
Mechelec Engineers & Manufacturers Vs. Basic Equipment Corporation
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.