RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
MANALI SINGHAL – Appellant
Versus
RAVI SINGHAL – Respondent
1. Execution is sought of the order dated 28th October, 1998 (in IA No. 11261/1997, IA No. 2634/1998 and IA No. 2635/1998 in CS(OS) No. 2583/1997) by attachment of moveable and immoveable properties of the judgment debtors (JDs) including rent yielded by the said properties, and sale thereof.
2. The execution petition, pending for the last more than 17 years, along with a number of applications filed therein came up before the undersigned on 24th August, 2016 when the following order was passed:-
“1. The counsel for the decree-holder states that this execution is of order dated 28th October, 1998 in CS(OS) No.2583/1997 and the aspect today for consideration is execution of Para 40 of the said order whereby the defendants / judgment debtors were directed to provide a residence to the plaintiff “as agreed upon in the family settlement dated November 04, 1994 (vide Clause 4), within two months” thereof. It is further stated that in the execution of the said para 40 of the order, the farmhouse of the judgment debtors at Samalkha was attached and has been ordered to be sold but the sale has not been effected as yet.
EA No.673/2000 (of the decree holder under Order 21 Rule 13 CPC)
Forward Construction Co. Vs. Prabhat Mandal (Regd.), Andheri
Ishwar Dutt Vs. Land Acquisition Collector
Kale Vs. Deputy Director of Consolidation
The Tata Engineering and Locomotive Company Ltd. Vs. The Gram Panchayat, Pimpri Waghere
Mathura Prasad Bajoo Jaiswal Vs. Dossibai N.B. Jeejeebhoy
Fidelita Shipping Co. Ltd. Vs. V/o Exportchleb
Bhavan Vaja Vs. Solanki Hanuji Khodaji Mansang
Sajjadanashin Sayed Md. B.E. EDR. Vs. Musa Dadabhai Ummer
City Municipal Council, Bhalki Vs. Gurappa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.