MUKTA GUPTA
GLAXO GROUP LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
AAR ESS REMEDIES PRIVATE LIMITED – Respondent
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
I.A. No. 11786/2016 (under Order XI Rule 1 (4) (as amended by the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015)
1. By this application the plaintiff had sought leave to file the additional documents if need be.
2. Learned counsel for the plaintiff seeks to withdraw the application as no further documents are required to be filed.
3. The application is dismissed as withdrawn.
I.A. Nos. 11787/2017 and 8435/2017 (under Section 151 CPC)
1. By this application the plaintiff seeks to place the figures relating to the sales and promotional expenditure incurred by the plaintiff towards sale of products under its trademarks FORTUM, FORTAM, ZINACEF, AUGMENTIN and FORTAZ and towards promotion of trademark in sealed cover.
2. The documents have already been placed in sealed cover and are taken on record.
3. Application is disposed of.
CS(COMM) 1328/2016 and I.A. No. 8434/2017 (under Order XIII Rule 2 CPC-by plaintiff)
1. Plaintiff in the present suit has sought the following reliefs :
“(a) An order of permanent injunctio
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.